Saturday, September 26, 2026

 

As many voices are calling for our country to find common ground in this era of political polarization, I too wish for that commonality. But I lament especially with the way Donald Trump has sought to trash established institutions and practices, that common ground may have been eviscerated to the point of no return.

I have shared on these pages before my view that the 30% or so of Americans who continue to support Trump no matter what he does are people who wish to live in a very different country than the one we had before 2017. They are the MAGA or Red Nation. My project since Trump was returned to office has been to challenge people who work and reside in Blue places, multiracial democratic spaces, to hold their ground against the Trumpian onslaught.

This is because I believe we have come to the place where we live culturally in two distinct nations: one Red and the other Blue. I believe that those of us of a Blue persuasion must weather this Red Nation storm in the belief that if we stick our guns, “this too shall pass.” Central to the problem that Trumpist face is that Red and Blue nation people and those who don’t neatly fit into either pole all live amongst each other. That is why I believe that if Blue nationalists hunker down, continuing to do what they do, take hits from Trumpian Red nationalism and wait out the storm, they’ll still be around when Trump leaves office, though undoubtedly in a battered and weaker state than before.

Two voices over the last year have mapped a hopeful way forward in these perilous times. Joyce Vance, who you might know from the podcast Sisters in Law and as an MSNOW legal commentator, published a wonderful little book entitled Giving Up Is Unforgivable at around the time Trump got re-elected. In it she surveys the depth and breadth of our political institutions and the checks and balances built into them. She cites the Civil War, two world wars, the Great Depression, Watergate and the period after 9-11 as moments that placed great stress on national institutions and argues they were able to respond to and endure.[1]

Vance focuses primarily on our political institutions. The federal courts have done their job ordering many of Trump’s executive orders and other acts be halted on statutory or constitutional grounds. Sadly, with the big exceptions of tariffs and birthright citizenship, the Supreme Court has appeased Trump by employing the fast track “shadow docket” to permit him to do his thing illegally.[2] 

The shadow docket has been used to allow mid-decade redistricting favorable to Republicans since late last year.[3] Its use is intended to further dilute the Democratic vote and lock in a Republican majority for the foreseeable future. Still, Vance exhorts us to use First Amendment rights to pressure Trump from all angles, especially she implores us to vote.

We shall see if the massive Republican effort to distort mid-term election outcomes in their favor works. People may be so unhappy with Trump’s policies that they vote his Republican minions out of power.

Meanwhile, at the level of the big private institutions of civil society we have also seen  capitulation of some major universities, law firms and media companies under pressures from the Trump administration.  Last December David Callahan of The Nation raised the issue of the role major private foundations can play in deploying their resources to counter Trumpism.[4] This was after the Department of Justice had announced that it was considering investigating George Soros’ Open Society Foundation for supporting domestic terrorism and illegal immigration. They also singled out the Freedom Together Foundation and the Ford Foundation for scrutiny. Callahan questioned whether the foundations, which are “creatures of the capitalism,” were up to “challenging the system which had spawned them.”[5] 

I’m happy to report that nearly two years into Trump 2.0 a number of big foundations are  holding up quite well. In May the Open Society Foundation announced a “$300 million initiative to improve the daily lives of Americans and stand up for the rule of law while strengthening rights and freedoms under attack across the United States.” This “represents a meaningful expansion of the Foundations’ work on democracy reform and economic justice.”[6]

Freedom Together Foundation CEO Deepak Bhargava swiftly threw support for Open Society when it was first targeted saying it was a “blatant efforts to weaken civil society’s ability to hold the government accountable.”[7] In the summer of 2025 Freedom Together announced it was seeking to raise $250 million to help grassroots groups “push back against President Trump and what they see as his steady drift toward authoritarianism.”[8] Having announced its intentions the foundation seems to be stealthily going about its business. So I have no idea of how their efforts have progressed.

I was not able to find information about the Ford Foundation’s response to the administration’s threats. But if you peruse its website today, you’re immediately confronted with the rubric “The Work of Our Moment” with subtitle “The Importance of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” Knowing that Ford operates globally one could think that heading applies to anywhere in the world. But the adjoining photo features a brown woman and child standing gleefully next to a sign reading “Vote Aqui” (Vote Here).[9]

Alas! I must once again point us to the wisdom of Antonio Gramsci which relates so well to what the Blue Nation faces today. Trump’s Red Nation ...

at the moment of (its) advance and attack ... would find themselves confronted by a

 line of defence which was still effective ... the defenders ae not demoralized, nor do they abandon

their positions, ... nor do they lose faith in their own strength or their own future.[10]

 Trump and company are throwing spaghetti at the wall, but in many important places it isn’t sticking! The Open Society, Ford and Freedom Together Foundations; the CNN, MSNOW and Politico media companies; Harvard and the other universities, and also the big law firms that haven’t caved to Trump. They are not “demoralized,” and have not lost faith in our future. They point the way for small, localized actors in civil society nationwide to oppose and outlast. Trump 2.0



[1] Joyce Vance, Giving Up Is Unforgivable.

[2] The shadow docket rulings allow the Supreme Court to rule without the benefit of oral argument and without offering legal reasoning for decisions.

 [3] For “shadow docket” explanation see https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB11391/LSB11391.1.pdf. For criticism of its use see Ketanji Brown Jackson rips Supreme Court’s shadow docket over Trump policy wins.

[4] David Callahan, “Philanthropy in the Crosshairs,” The Nation, December 2025, pp. 32-37.

[5] Ibid, p. 36.

 [10] Hoare, Q.  & Smith, G.N  (Eds.). (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers. 1971, p. 235

No comments:

Post a Comment