Saturday, August 17, 2024

The Democratic Party and the White Working Class

 

The Democratic Party and the White Working Class

            The naming of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as the Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee by Kamala Harris has thus far, served to continue the euphoria progressives are feeling since Joe Biden dropped out of the presidential race. What we have now are two V-P candidates from the Midwest who come from White working-class backgrounds. The demographic and ideological differences between Trump and Harris notwithstanding, both Walz and his Republican counterpart J.D. Vance are viewed as enhancing their respective tickets’ chances with White working-class voters in Midwestern swing states.

            The Democratic Party based has been dominated by identity politics social movements since the civil rights era of the 1960s. The Republican Party’s establishment was controlled by the Wall Street and country club crowds until 2016. But in that year Trump’s candidacy mobilized White nationalist and fundamentalist Chrisitan identities on right to vote in the primaries. Those most passionate about both of those identities tend to be working-class and poor people. It’s thus, in that way that “White working-class voters” became a big tent identity on the right.

            Howard Winant crafts a trenchant analysis of the way that the White working class feels a loss of power and positionality within society. He posits three factors in this respect. First, is the loss of connection to ethnicity offering a deeper connection to “culture” as European ethnic identities were assimilated into “White Americanness” across the 20th century. Second, there is the loss of resonance for a class-based culture built around labor organizing in a manufacturing economy. Deindustrialization and the dispersal of workers into lower-wage service industry jobs undercut that class/cultural solidarity.

Finally, the victories of the civil rights movement have made it a disadvantage to be White. First, because affirmative action policies in education, contracting and hiring led to “reverse discrimination” against Whites in American institutional life. And secondly, there is the widespread belief that there is no White culture today. Meanwhile, cultures of color (Blacks, Latinos) are considered “hip,’ and to have “feeling.”[1]

Consequently, White people in general, but especially working-class Whites with less education and high-tech skills can feel that American society has left them behind. This breeds a group identity built around resentment toward other groups (POC, feminist, LBBTQI, etc.) who seem to get all the attention around their needs, while no one in the political establishment attends to the needs of White people.

At the turn of the century the late Ken Hoover and I began to puzzle about what was going on with the White people who joined the anti-government militia movements that eventuated in the Oklahoma City federal building bombing killing 169 people in 1995. I was very much a group identity social movement guy. Hoover was a student of social psychology. We were able to bridge those two literatures to get at what was driving certain White men to commit such extremist acts. I would argue that those people in the 1990s were driven by a set of experiences and attitudes much akin to the outlook of those who stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Let’s unpack these ideas further. Mostly we talk about identity as a group-level consciousness, but identity is fundamentally about the individual, about who “I” am. Who we are as individuals though “involves relations between individual characteristics and social processes of legitimation, recognition, and validation.”[2] Three quarters of a century of social psychological research demonstrates that identity is made up of three sets of relations: competencies, communities and commitments.[3] The inability to fulfill any of these relations can cause alienation, resentment and a search for scapegoats upon whom to blame one’s problems.

I’ll now elaborate on those three Cs.

Competencies: Possessing skills and a job that contribute to the functioning of the economy.

Commitments: Having the ability to live up to enduring personal obligations to families, friends, and associates.

Communities: Being a member in good standing of a community that is recognized as intrinsically valuable.

Commitments refers to smaller social groupings beginning with families and friends but extending to service organizations (Rotary, Elks, Kiwanis, League of Women Voters, scouting, etc.), sporting activities (playing, coaching), and yes, political organizations (social movements, special interest groups, political parties). In contrast community incorporates larger collectivities such as the culture of a region, city or town; or a religious denomination. Passionate allegiance to social identity movements which extend beyond a local setting often become communities as well.

            People of all kinds of social identities are experiencing the pressures of an economy shifting from manufacturing and natural resource extraction to high-tech and automation. It’s well documented that the Black people have suffered more from deindustrialization than any other demographic.[4] But Winant’s argument casts light on the way that loss of social status via the civil rights movement and the popularity of Black/Brown popular culture have had a debilitating psychological effect on the White working class. In summation, many Whites (not just the working-class) are bummed out by the loss of white skin privilege.

            The Republican Party has manipulated White voters by defending White privilege, but it has done nothing to alleviate their economic hardship in the shifting economy. Democrats have been on the defensive. They accepted the Reaganist formula of tax cuts and government program cuts that hurt middle and working classes of all races. They also accepted easy non-solutions like the “war on drugs” that demonized urban Black and Brown communities. Democrats always preferred fewer programmatic cuts, and many of them did oppose the war on drugs. But it is easy to see why many working-class people of all races say that the Democrats haven’t done much for them either.

            Republican V-P nominee J.D. Vance’s memoir, Hillbilly Elegy, blames Appalachian Whites’ own behavior and choices for their plight, not the lack of social services and opportunities where they live. He is no friend of the working-class.[5] Democrats offer Tim Walz aSes a working-class hero --- school teacher, football coach, proud union member, etc.

            While Democrats controlled the White House and Congress from 2021 to 2023, they passed the Infrastructure and Inflation Reduction Acts, which together direct over $3 trillion dollars in spending to a wide range of public works, climate and health care-pricing initiatives. Lots of jobs are being created by those laws, which represent the largest social spending undertaken since Roosevelt’s New Deal.[6] For some reason many White working-class voters still care less about the material benefits Democrats have brought, than they do about immigration restriction, abortion prevention and holding on to their guns. The Republicans don’t offer them jobs, or the education to acquire skills for the new economy: things that would give them competency, or better enable them to fulfill their commitments. But Republicans do prey upon White psychological insecurity in the new cultural milieu by offering them a racialized (and genderized and religious) community against immigrants, affirmative action and reproductive freedom). Wat can progressives do to create an alternative sense of community that defeats this project of the right.

Political Parties, Elections and Values

            American political parties are primarily concerned with winning elections. They plough millions of dollars into trying to understand where voters are in the present, and devising campaign strategies to convince voters that they offer the best policies for them. Electoral strategies are only tangentially related to voters’ values. or some vision for making America a better place to live. Confronted with the choice between Trumpian fascism or multiracial democracy though, the values and vision thing are front burner electoral issues.

            Kamala Harris may well win the election this fall and Tim Walz may play well in Peoria and across the Midwest. But somebody on the progressive side of the street must begin to take the psychological dissonance and trauma of the White-working class seriously, if we are to avert race war in this country!

            So how can we alleviate White working-class concerns over their loss of power in America? Journalist Joan Walsh wrote a lovely book some years ago entitled What’s the Matter with White People?[7] An Irish American from New York City, Walsh chronicles the shift of her White working-class family from the Democratic to Republican Party since the 1960s, and the centrality of racial politics in that shift. She calls for a strategy of equity and inclusion that explicitly reaches out to demoralized White people: a project to turn the discourse on race on the left to one about a multiracial working-class.[8] Bidenism has taken steps in that direction, but serious outreach to White workers involving reconciliation and healing to bridge the racial divide within the working class needs to be undertaken.

Reverend Dr. William Barber has built a two-pronged movement in recent times geared toward addressing this issue. Barber began his quest in 2013 as a founder of “Moral Mondays,” a weekly rally on the steps of the North Carolina Capitol to protest voting rights restrictions and budget cuts that hurt the working class. Since then, he has been a co-founder of “Repairers of the Breach” (2015), an pan religious organization committed to reconciling the social damage done by centuries of racial, class, gender identity and religious divisions. Barber has also been the central figure in the second “Poor People’s Campaign” (2017), a secular movement focused squarely on multiracial poverty, and more broadly taking on the same agenda as Repairers of the Breach. One program of Repairers of the Breach pairs White and Black Protestant congregations in meetings to find reconciliation and healing in through their common faith.

Both the work the “Repairers” and the Poor People’s Campaign engage people of all races and classes in pursuit of a common moral vision for America which includes working-class Whites. Read Reverend Barber’s latest book, White Poverty, or any of his earlier works for a rich description of his project.[9] Whatever happens in November, progressives must seriously undertake this multiracial democratic “cultural project” to complement efforts in electoral politics. In this way progressive American nationalism can offer the education enabling all workers to participate in the new economy. That will give them the competency to participate in the new economy and fulfill their commitments to family and friends. That progressivism also paves the way toward a more inclusive American national community embracing all demographic groups.

 



[1] Howard Winant, “Behind Blue Eyes: Whiteness and Contemporary U>S. Racial Politics.” Michelle Fine, et. al. Off White:Readings on Power, Privilege, and Resistance.2nd Ed. New York: Routledge Publishers, 2004, 3-16.

[2] Kenneth R. Hoover and Vernon D. Johnson, “Identity-Driven Violence: Reclaiming Civil Society," Journal of Hate Studies, vol. 3, 2004, 87.

[3] ibid., from note 6 in text.

[4] William Wilson is the foremost scholar of the Black underclass. A nice synopsis of his analysis is found in More Than Just Race: Being Black and Poor in the Inner City. New York: W.W. Norton, 2009.

[5] J.D. Vance, Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and a Culture in Crisis. Harper Paperbacks, 2018.

[6] Murray, I. and DiMartino, J. (2022). ‘Recapping Democrats breakthrough summer on Capitol hill: climate, gun

violence and more. ABC News, August 9, 2022. Retrieved from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/recapping-democrats-breakthrough-summer-capitol-hill-climate-gun/story?id=88096085

 

[7] Joan Walsh, What’s the Matter with White People. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2012

[8] Howard Winant, "Postmodern Racial Politics," Socialist Review, 1990

[9] William J, Barber and Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, White Poverty

No comments:

Post a Comment