Monday, January 5, 2026

Ode to the Brothers in the Barber Shop: Deportations and the Future of a Black-Brown Coalition

 

I grew up in the sho’ nuff ‘hood’ in Avondale, Cincinnati Ohio in the 1960s, but I made my career as a college professor at Western Washington University in Bellingham, Washington. The university has a few hundred African American students in a student body of roughly 15,000. The city is approaching 100,000 in population, but with an African American population (that they can count) of around 1,500. You could double that if you figure for the biracial population who are part African American. But there ain’t no ‘hood’ in Bellingham Washington.

I have been active in my community around multiracial democratic issues since Jesse Jackson’s call for a Rainbow Coalition in the 1980s. But I haven’t been in the middle of debates abut race and politics in African American communities for many years. My brother Kevin lives in St. Petersburg Florida, a city of a quarter of a million people with a sizeable Black community.

Over the decades Kevin and I have shared notes in our conversations about race and community activism. Kevin is a Muslim, having converted to Islam a couple of decades ago. He is an indispensable purveyor of perspectives from Black communities on the political issues of our times.

Since Trump’s return to the presidency, we have had spirited exchanges over two issues: the decline in Black male support for Kamala Harris from the levels previous Democratic presidential candidates received; and what the posture of the Black community should be as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) cracks down on immigrants across the country. It is the issue of the ICE crackdown that I want to address today.

President Trump’s aggressive anti-immigrant stance is the cornerstone of his MAGA agenda. Concerns of a ’great replacement’ of White people as the US population approaches a majority of people of color have aggravated White nationalist since Barack Obama came out of nowhere to win the presidency in 2008. Some moderate White assimilationist have also voiced concerns that the values of Western civilization are under assault as non-Europeans become the majority of the population. Many African Americans also dislike immigrants because they view them as ‘replacing” Black people in the economy. Taken together, that was enough to make immigration the second most important issue in the 2024 election behind inflation.[1]

Latino support for Kamala Harris tanked compared to previous elections. Whereas Biden got 65% of the Latino vote in 2020. Harris gained only 56% of them in 2024; and she garnered only 44% of the Latino male vote. These numbers have prompted a wave of attacks on Latinos in Black social media (some of it real and some it fake).  Accusations that Latinos are not to be trusted anymore and that Black folks must steel ourselves to go it alone in this irretrievably anti-Black society have been rife.

ICE, Customs and Border Protection and the Border Patrol have cracked down in places where Latinos work and shop, and where their kids go to school. In our conversations my brother has shared the view from the ‘Black Street’ that Latinos have bever been there for us  in the Jim Crow era, the civil rights movement or more recently in the Black Lives Matter movement. So why should we step up in support of them now?

Mexican American Labor History

African Americans and others will know well the history of our enslavement, the Jim Crow experience after slavery and our continuing struggles for racial justice and equity since the 1960s. Since slavery we have been a stigmatized minority always on the defensive just to survive.

But let me just talk about Mexican Americans, the largest of the Latino groups in this country. The saga begins with the loss of half of Mexico’s territory to the US in the Mexican War (1846-48). In order to consolidate their gains American settlers visited a reign of terror upon Mexicans in the conquered areas including wholesale land dispossession.

Yet the US needed labor to make the newly acquired lands economically viable. Mexicans toiled not only in the fields, but in ranching, mining and in the building of the Southern Pacific Railroad. Those from south of the border were contracted to come north and make the economy work.

But when the Great Depression came approximately one million Mexican workers were deported to make way for White workers. When the need for labor to supply US troops in World War Two occurred, the Bracero Program brought in thousands of Mexican workers starting in 1942. But in 1954 when recession hit the economy after the Korean War the US imposed Operation Wetback. Mexicans were rounded up and jailed ’herded into trucks and trains, then shipped back to Mexico.’[2] Over a million people were subjected to those forced removals - sound familiar? However, when the economy picked up again the Bracero Program was restarted.

Mexican Americans might exclaim ‘y’all wasn’t there for us when we were experiencing those mass deportations!  They would be right, because we were too busy trying to defend our communities and build our movement for civil rights and social justice.

But Mexican Americans were also gettin’ busy forging a civil rights movement of their own across the 20th century. Ever heard of Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta and the heroic struggle in the 1960s to build the United Farmworkers of America? The UFW won the first union contract for farm workers in US history in 1966.

Black-Brown Solidarity During the Civil Rights Movement

Across the same period that the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was chipping away at segregation in public education in the federal courts the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) was doing the same.[3] In fact we begin to see evidence of embryonic Black-Brown solidarity in the Mendez v. Westminster case before the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in California in 1946. It was a K-12 school desegregation case. The NAACP, which had been focusing on higher education cases, filed an amicus (friend of the court) brief in Mendez. LULAC won in Mendez. That success at the K-12 level fostered a rethinking of the NAACP’s legal strategy which eventuated in filing the five cases that were taken together in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka Kansas.

Many of us know of the heroic role played by the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) in fighting the Jim Crow system in the South in the 1960s. You may know that SNCC, though seen as a Black civil rights organization, included many White members. SNCC was a student organization found on university campuses all over the country.

The saga of Black and White students trained in non-violent civil disobedience before going south to challenge segregation is well-chronicled. But do we know about Elizabeth Martinez and Maria Varela, two young Mexican American women who were SNCC supporters up north and went south for the Freedom Summer of 1964? They each played prominent roles in the Black liberation movement. When SNNC transformed into a Black Power organization in 1966 Marinez and Varela took their experience and skills into the emerging Chicano movement which, in ways similar to SNCC, was aspiring for ‘Brown Power.’ [4]

Along the same vein, I was recently listening to an interview with Mahmoud Mamdani, the father of New York’s new democratic socialist mayor, Zohran Mamdani. The elder Mamdani is a highly regarded scholar at Columbia University. He joined SNCC when he was an exchange student at the University of Pittsburgh and was arrested in the march from Selma to Montgomery in 1965. Mamdani was born in India, grew up in Uganda, and experienced the expulsion of Indians there in the 1970s. So he understood racial repression when he saw it.[5]

From Race to Class and Multiracial Solidarity

I didn’t have the time to research more evidence for Brown support for Black struggles over the generations, but I’m guessing these examples are just the tip of the iceberg. We do, however, know that Martin Luther King had embarked upon the ‘Poor People’s Campaign’ when he was assassinated in 1968. He was recognizing that racial oppression is also economic oppression, and  that people of all races suffered class exploitation in the capitalist system.

As he moved around the country to galvanize the ‘Poor People’s Campaign’ King met Chavez and Huerta of the Farmworkers Union and several other prominent Mexican American leaders.[6] He heard them and was working his way toward a movement for ‘economic justice in a multiracial America.’ Many of us think economic elites in very dark places feared King’s skill as a messenger and the potency of his message and decided he had to be liquidated.

King was melding the many racial grievances about poverty and oppression with a cross racial discourse on class and economic deprivation. Jesse Jackson was expert at weaving race and class together in his conception of the Rainbow Coalition in the 1980s. After listening to Zohran Mamdani’s inaugural address in New York, I think he is the best of this new generation of left populist at delivering the same message.

African American political scientist Michael Dawson introduced the concept of ‘linked fate’ to explain why middle and upper-class African Americans vote in large percentages for Democratic candidates despite their affluence. His answer: the level of ferocity of racial oppression imposed upon African Americans induced a sense of group solidarity that transcended class distinctions.[7] I have shown here how the level of oppression visited upon Mexican Americans especially, has at times been ferocious.  

People of all races joined the Black Lives Matter protests after the murder of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. That widespread interracial solidarity (including some White people) offers hope of a burgeoning ethic of linked fate across racial and class lines in ways that MLK and Jesse Jackson envisioned. Today African Americans cannot afford to sit on the sidelines, because after the systemic racist juggernaut finishes steamrolling Brown immigrants, guess who’s next?[8]



[1] Andrew Author, “The Inflation and Immigration Election,” Center for Immigration Studies, https://cis.org/Arthur/Inflation-and-Immigration-Election-2024

 [2] Juan Gonzalez, Harvest of Empire. Revised edition. New York:  Penguin Books, 2011, p. 222-23.

[3] Vaca, N.C. (2004). The Presumed Alliance. New York: Harper-Collins Publishers.

[6] King also met with Indigenous and White Americans during his crusade.

[7] Dawson Michael C. Behind the mule: Race and class in African American politics. Princeton University Press; 1994.

[8] Trump has no love for Black People either. One has only to observe the way Trump has singled out African American public officials like New York Attorney Letitia James, or Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook; or the early data showing that Black women have the demographic most affected by the massive firings in the federal government, https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/black-women-face-record-job-layoffs-under-trump/ar-AA1M8d1D

.

Monday, December 29, 2025

The Lights Are On! The Fruits are Being Born!

                                        c

                  Damani, Cedric and El Layla Johnson: Kwanzaa 2021, Playa Del Carmen, Mexico

Last year as I spiraled into darkness anticipating a second Trump presidency, I posted an article and attending interview with me about Kwanzaa, the African American Festival of the First Fruits. At that time I wrote ... 

              Nevertheless, the festival of the harvest morphs seamlessly into a celebration of

birth (of Christ), of the miracle of the Virgen de Guadalupe, of the rededication

of the desecrated temple (Hanukkah) and a pagan new year (solstice), i.e., the transit

from past to future. For many these celebrations are not religious at all, but chances

to bask in the company of family and loved ones as seasons change and the calendar flips.[1]

 

I want to circle back and relate Kwanzaa to Hanukkah now. Hanukkah commemorates events following the Hebrew victory over the Syrians and the liberation of the Second Jewish Temple at Jerusalem in the 2nd century BCE. As worshippers prepared to relight the candelabrum (menorah) at the alter they discovered that there was only enough oil to light it for one day. However, once lit the flame burned for eight days until the faithful were able to procure the oil needed to keep it going. This was a miracle.  After eight days the lights were still on! The festival of Hanukkah, the “dedication,” was born. Alternatively known as the “Festival of the Lights,” it is celebrated for eight days.

The Jews of the 2nd century BCE were opposing the imposition of Syrian culture and religion and forced assimilation on the Jewish people. In a parallel fashion Kwanzaa was born in the 1960s by Black nationalist in Los Angeles after the Watts Rebellion of 1965. Recalling my post last year, Kwanzaa “was born in the spirit of Black Power, and a yearning by Black people to create our own value system and institutions, because America was failing to assimilate us.”[2]

There ARE differences between the two holidays. Judaism had already existed for more than 3,000, Kwanzaa years when the insurrection against Syrian assimilation occurred. The Jews were a strong people, proud of an already ancient heritage.

In contrast Black Americans in the 1960s were a people thrown together in slavery from all over West Africa. After slavery we suffered the traumatic effects of Jim Crow segregation and ghettoization in the urban setting. The racial rebellions of the 1960s were sparked by the confluence of segregation, lack of opportunity and over policing of urban ghettos against the  backdrop of the civil rights movement.

Ron Karenga was foremost among activists in Los Angeles who formed the Black nationalist US organization after the Watts rebellion of 1965. Believing that the oppression of Black people required solutions beyond the integrationist/assimilationist program of the civil rights movement, US devised a cultural project arguing that the advancement of Black people could never be realized by integration into the institutions of White America.

Kwanzaa arose from the Afrocentric philosophy of Kawaida (the “norm” in Swahili) which was constructed by the US organization. Dubbed the “Festival of the First Fruits” and observed December 26 – January 1, Kwanzaa begins as a celebration of the harvest and ends with resolutions for the year to come.

Both Kwanzaa and Hanukkah are cultural projects against forced assimilation. Each evolved after periods of violent conflict between the oppressor and the oppressed. While Hanukkah is over 5,000 years old, Kwanzaa is 59 years old this year. But Kwanzaa was born in the era when Black Americans were looking inward, finding themselves and on the way to transforming themselves into African Americans.

As American progressives congeal around a project of multiracial democracy with recognition of our national subcultures centered, and a powerful Black presence at its core, the significance of Kwanzaa in the middle of our holiday season has never been more profound.

Inspired by our Jewish comrades who keep the menorah burning in ancient Jerusalem, events over these last few months show that the lights of the American left are still on![3] And drawing upon the spirit of Kwanzaa, we are tapping the fruits of the early resistance and resolving to keep fighting back in the new year.

 



[1] Vernon Damani Johnson, “Kwanzaa 2024: Progressive Holiday Meditations in the Time of Trump,”

 https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/kwanzaa-2024-progressive-holiday-meditations-time-trump-johnson-ha6fc/?trackingId=O74xxctBS6%2B0LhSiiuCZ0A%3D%3D

 [2] ibid.

 

[3] Examples beginning in the fall include the public opposition to National Guard deployment in US cities; sweeping victories of Democrats in the November elections as voters perceived that Trump has failed them on the affordability issue; Marjorie Taylor Green’s vocal criticism of Trump over the slow release of the Eppstein files and her dramatic decision to disavow MAGA and not run for re-election; Indiana Republicans vote against redistricting to suit Trump electoral aims, etc., etc.

Wednesday, November 26, 2025

Left Populism and Democratic Socialism

 

Much national attention has been given to the victory of Zohran Mamdani in the mayoral election in New York City. But in Seattle and King County Washington there were equally astonishing local election outcomes in the races for mayor of Seattle and the King County executive.

In the County executive race Girmay Zahilay won. He is 38 years old of Ethiopian descent. He was born in a refugee camp in Sudan to parents fleeing civil war in their home country. Ivy League educated, he first made waves by defeating Larry Gossett for a seat on the King County Council in 2019. Gossett, a former Black Panther and president of the Washington State Rainbow Coalition, had served since 1993. In a hotly contested county executive election Zahilay bested Claudia Balducci, a multi-term county councilwoman from the center-left with demonstrated ability to get things done.

Simultaneously, Katie Wilson, aged 43 defeated the Afro-Japanese incumbent Bruce Harrell by less than a one percent margin. Wilson dropped out of Oxford University within a semester of graduating with honors in physics and philosophy. She describes herself as a socialist but is not a member of any socialist organization and the Democratic Socialist of America chapter in Seattle did not endorse her.

Seattle/King County is home to Microsoft and Amazon. As a center of the tech boom the region has witnessed extreme polarization of wealth and has a large, unhoused population. Even more than is true elsewhere affordability is a hotbed issue. After the murder of George Floyd Seattle saw one of the more explosive “defund the police” movements. It featured the Capitol Hill Occupied Protest (CHOP) where activist took over a city park causing the city to abandon the police precinct across the street. The fallout from the city’s handling of the movement would see the police chief resign and a mayor who had been the darling of the city’s elite decide not to run for re-election.[1]

In these posts I focus on the role of race in distinguishing between left and right populism. But I also highlight the way that populism pushes the political mainstreams on each side toward new objectives. Today I want to tease out the way that left populist economic thinking is pushing mainstream liberalism toward either an explicit advancement of social liberalism or possibly democratic socialism (See Figure 1).

The Political Careers of Zahilay and Mamdani

                                                                 Girmay Zahilay                            



                                                                                    Katie Wilson


Like Zohran Mamdani, Zahilay and Wilson are left-wing populist. As someone who had resided in public housing as a youth Zahilay campaigned on the expansion of public housing and opposition to traditional juvenile detention methods.[2]  In a city that fell behind in mass transit as it grew with the tech boom, Wilson co-founded The Seattle Transit Riders Union in 2011.

Both candidates represent a younger generation that is concerned about social justice and affordability. As a county councilman Zahilay secured funding for a community center in the underserved neighborhood that he grew up in. And he was behind the building of tiny homes to get people off the streets.

Under Wilson’s leadership the Transit Riders Union has lobbied for the entire range of issues affecting transit riders: ‘a mission that encompasses everything from bus fares to affordable housing to preventing sweeps of homeless encampments.’[3] In 2020, Wilson successfully advocated for the creation of Seattle's JumpStart tax, which taxes private employers to fund affordable housing.  During her campaign Wilson criticized Mayor Harrell for proposing to take funds from JumpStart funds to balance the city budget.  

Both of these young public servants are clearly progressive. I could not find any statements on Zahilay’s political views, but he identifies as a Democrat. As mentioned above Wilson identifies as a socialist ideologically but she also stood for office as a Democrat.

Democratic Socialism and Social Liberalism

The establishment gets itself into a tither over the intrusion of socialism into our national political discourse as a legitimate worldview. Because this ‘s’ word has been off limits in this land of quintessential capitalism, we don’t teach the broad body of socialist ideas in our schools. Moreover, socialism isn’t talked about in day-to-day conversations by anyone who isn’t far to the left of center in national politics.

But that is starting to change! The problem of affordability in contemporary society is a crisis of capitalism. Socialism broadly is belief in any set of policies that tax or regulate the private sector of the economy in the name of collective well-being. Most Americans equate socialism with communism of the kind witnessed in Eastern bloc countries and China during the Cold War. That state socialism eliminated the private sector of the economy and market competition. But in Scandinavia (and to a lesser extent much of Western Europe) we see democratic socialism which permits capitalism to function, but imposes higher taxes to pay for health care, education and other social services. Read that as capitalism as a principle of wealth creation and socialism as a principle for the redistribution of wealth and opportunity.

Capitalism grows out of another great philosophical tradition ... liberalism. Liberalism is the belief in individual liberty, equality before the law and the protection of property rights. Economic liberalism emphasizes property rights and a fee market economy. Across the 19th century the polarization of wealth created by industrial capitalism saw the emergence of social liberalism as a doctrine foregrounding equality, not just before the law, but of opportunities to pursue ‘life, liberty and happiness.’

Equality in the realm of opportunity required government intervention into the economy to ameliorate the inequality produced by capitalism. That also meant higher taxes to pay for health care, education and other social services ... Sounds a lot like socialism!

Therein lies the conundrum for the Democratic Party and the way it handles candidates like Zahilay, Wilson and Mamdani. Zahilay identifies as a Democrat and his political positions place him squarely in the left-populist wing of the party. He’s not saying, perhaps because he’s savvy enough not to, but I would categorize him as a social liberal. As I’ve shown that’s not much different than democratic socialism.

Bernie Sanders’ unflinching presentation of himself as a democratic socialist since his 2016 presidential run, coming as it did in the wake of the Great Recession, has done much to popularize socialism in recent times among the young. Also, a lot of us have been socialist-oriented or open to socialistic policies since the 1960s. The FBI Counterintelligence Program repressed much of the extreme left, but many of the rest of us put our heads down, immersed ourselves in civil society and kept our views to ourselves.

Sanders’ popularity and the emergence of young charismatic socialists like Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Mamdani have served to make the word more palatable in mainstream political discourse for young and old alike.  The Democratic establishment is thrilled that affordability was embraced by center-left candidates like Mikie Sherrill in New Jersey and Abigail Spanberger in Virginia as well as Mamdani in New York City. But while the two governors elect stop with groceries and gasolene, Mamdani’s platform includes housing, healthcare and transportation.

Zahilay the social liberal and Wilson, the democratic socialist share those policy agendas as well. They speak to the concerns and real human needs of working and middle-class people in an economy that makes the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness out of reach for more and more people.

The late African revolutionary Amilcar Cabral puts it best.

Always bear in mind that the people are not fighting for ideas, ... They are fighting to win

material benefits, to live better and in peace, to see their lives go forward, to guarantee the

future of their children.[4]

So, Democrats can try to pigeonhole the Wilsons and the Zahilays of the world into abstract ideas, or they can embrace them because they are fighting for to win better material benefits for their families and communities in the future.

 

Figure 1. Progressivism and Ideology

                                                                Liberalism                              Populism (Sanders)

Economic Policy

Orientation

social welfarist capitalism

 

social welfarist capitalism,         democratic socialism

 

 

 



[1]Brad Holden, Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) or Organized Protest (CHOP) (Seattle),

Posted 12/30/2023, https://www.historylink.org/File/22870

 

[4] Amilcar Cabral, ‘Tell No Lies,! Claim No Easy Victories! Revolution in Guinea. Mothly Review Press, 1969, p. 86.

Friday, November 7, 2025

Do Not Lose Faith in Our Own Strength or Our Own Future

 

                     Do Not Lose Faith in Our Own Strength or Our Own Future 

My debt to the analytical framework of Antonio Gramsci’s theory of hegemony is well-known to those of you who follow my posts. I have been particularly interested in his concept of the “war of position”: the cultural and political contestation within the institutions of state and civil society. A la Gramsci, I believe that contention over the values society should be organized around occur at a myriad of micro-sites in the labyrinthine institutional systems of modern capitalism.  

In July 2023 I remarked on the massive street protests that had occurred on the left during movements from civil rights in the 1950s and 60s to BLM in the 2010s and 2020. Those episodes rocked the political establishment to its foundations. We won some incremental victories and we imagined that we had taken the first steps to setting the social order on a fundamentally new course. In the institutional setting it was akin to “a fierce artillery attack (that) seemed to have destroyed the enemy’s entire defensive system.”[1] But as Gramsci points out, in modern industrial societies like the US the superstructures (or institutions) of civil society are like the trench systems of modern warfare.” Actually our street protests and eloquent pleas in the media, etc., “had only destroyed the outer perimeter, and our valient comrades found “ themselves confronted by a line of defence which was still effective,” because “the defenders (of the system) are not demoralized, nor do they abandon their positions, even among the ruins, nor do they lose faith in their own strength or their own future.”[2]

Corporate America, the Federalist Society, White Christian nationalists ... these are the bastions of the “system” which have withstood massive assaults over the generations, have not lost faith in their own strength of their own futures. They are still there and show no signs of going away.

In the traumatizing wake of Trump’s return to office many of us have been in a quandary as to what to do to stop his regime’s massive assault on progressivism. I am among many who have advised us not to obey in advance, and to defend institutions.[3] In my posts I have done my best to chronicle those who have done those two things.  

As I digest the outcomes of local and state elections across the country this week it occurs to me that after Trumps frontal assault on agencies, bureaucracies, cities and entire states we in Blue America have been reeling. But from the beginning there have been some naysayers willing to stick their necks out in defiance, including, let me just once again acknowledge, several federal court judges in this regard.

Recent cracks in Trumps edifice include:

·       Farmers, many of whom voted for Trump, are starting to have buyer’s remorse as China begins to import from elsewhere  in response to Trump’s tariffs.

·       When ABC late night host Jimmy Kimmel suggested that the alleged killer of Charlie Kirk was a MAGA person, ABC suspended his show. ABC is a Disney company. Consumers demonstrated their power by dropping their subscriptions from Hulu and other Disney + streaming services. Disney + services lost nearly 3 million subscribers in September. Kimmel was quickly put back on the air. [4]

·       In October a number of renowned artists and cultural organizations announced a series of events they’re calling “Fall of Freedom” to oppose the “authoritarian overreach by the Trump administration” in the world of the arts and cultural production. Scheduled for November 21, “Fall for Freedom” will involve filmmakers Ava DuVernay and Michael Moore, and leading institutions such as the Leslie-Lohman Museum of Art (New York) Institute of Contemporary Art (Los Angeles) and the Woolly Mammoth Theater (Washington, D.C.). It’s billed as parallel to the “No Kings Movement” orchestrated by Indivisible.[5]

And on November 4th is their first opportunity to be heard since last November voters nationwide delivered strong rebukes to the direction the country is going under Trump 2.0. The sweeping victories of Abigail Spanberger for governor of Virginia and Mikie Sherrill for governor of New Jersey defied pundits seeing races they thought were tightening in recent weeks. The victory of democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, who ran as a Democrat, in the New York City mayoral election was also important for those opposing Trump, but for different reasons. Add to these the overwhelming approval of Proposition 50 in California, which counters Texas’s mid-decade pro-Republican gerrymandering of Congressional seats with the same tactics for California, and one sees many reasons to hope that we can sustain our multiracial democracy.

New Jersey and Virginia are different than New York City. Sherrill and Spanberger ran as centrist while Mamdani represents the progressive wing of the party. But they all ran on bread-and-butter issues of affordability and inflation in the costs of groceries, gasolene and in Mamdani’s case housing. These were all things Trump and MAGA were supposed to fix, yet inflation in these areas and more continues apace fueled by Trump’s tariffs. The pushback from private places in civil society and the expression of anti-MAGA sentiments in the political sphere suggest that after being back on our heels the broad left has steadied itself and is pushing back.

So now I want to flip the script. I have suggested in earlier posts that we must defend Blue spaces against the Trumpian onslaught. The results from this week’s elections suggest that Red America behind Trump is being confronted by a line of defence which was still effective,” that WE  “are not demoralized.” WE have not “ abandoned our positions, ... nor (lost) faith in (our) own strength or (our) future.”[6] Rather, WE are fighting the war of position in the trenches of civil society and the state. Hitch up your seatbelts. That struggle is far from over.

 

 



 

1 Hoare, Q., & Smith, G.N. (Eds.). (1971). Selections from (Gramsci) the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers. (p. 235)

 

2 Ibid.

 

[3] Most prominently, Timothy Snyder in On Tyranny,

[4] It should be noted that Kimmel’s program is still scheduled for cancellation when his contract expires next year. See https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/disney-lost-nearly-3-million-subscribers-after-jimmy-kimmel-suspension-report/ar-AA1OV7V4

 

[5] Small, Z. Artist Plan to Unite in Defiance,” New York Times, Octber 15, 2025, p. C5.

[6] Hoare and Smith, p. 235.

Sunday, October 19, 2025

We Are the Blue American Nation

 

We Are the Blue American Nation!

Speech delivered at No Kings Rally, Bellingham Washington, October 18, 2025

Vernon Damani Johnson

l. We believe in Democracy! In fact, we believe in Multiracial Democracy!

a.Trump’s nation, the Red Nation, has abandoned democracy.  It’s architects, the authors of Project 2025, have espoused belief in “the constitutional republic.” This is basically two things: First, that the authority to rule should not be hereditary. That authority should emanate from the people, not family lineage. Secondly, though authority to rule comes from the people, it need not necessarily be democratic. That is to say that a constitutional republic does not need to be based on the will of the majority.

b. The founding fathers were not democrats. They were indeed constitutional republicans. We can’t forget that none of the original 13 states allowed all adults over the age of 18 to vote ... We can’t forget that the Electoral College was created as a check on majority rule.

ll. The founders were afraid of you, the demos. They feared democracy. But once the genie of government by the people, and for the people was let out of the bottle, the trajectory of American history took on a life of its own.

a.The Red Nation wants to destroy the democracy that popular movements fought so hard to build across the 20th century.

lll.

a. The Red Nation opposes reproductive freedom for women and women’s equality in general.

b. The Red Nation Objects to LGBTQI rights and gender affirming care for trans and queer people.

c. The Red Nation is against the right of workers to unionize and bargain with the bosses over the conditions of work.

d. They deny climate change. Trump has already gutted the staffing of the Enviro-metal Protection Agency. He has halted the disbursement of funds allocated to implement the Inflation Reduction Act, which has significant monies in it to move us toward a Green economy ...

e. His policies have the potential to do great harm to the impact of Washington’s Climate Commitment Act; the most comprehensive state level environmental legislation in the country.

lV. In essence, the Red Nation represents most of the values our Blue Nation opposes ... But its bedrock, the principle that excites its base the most and leaves them salivating, is white nationalism ... White supremacy!

a. This Red nationalism, the traditional American nation, is built upon the dispossession of the indigenous people and Black slavery.

b. The largest percentage of the Latino population are of Mexican descent. They are mestizo, part European, but the other part is indigenous. They also were dispossessed in the Mexican War (1846-48).

c. When Trump rode down the escalator in 2016, he led with “build the border wall” and stricter immigration policies. His crackdown in major cities as I speak today, and in the places where Latino immigrants work shows his continuing focus on curtailing the browning of America.

d. Trump has tapped into a deep vein in the White American psyche ... the concern by many White people that a country founded by them and only for them will be irretrievable if something drastic doesn’t happen.

e. Christian nationalist, anti-gun control fanatics, libertarians, and avowed racists have forged a coalition intent on terminating the conversation about what it means to be American.

f. They know they are a minority of the population. That’s why they are so excited by Trump. He is blatantly subverting longstanding democratic processes.  His disciples in Congress and on the Supreme Court remain silent ignoring the checks on executive power at the core of the Constitution.

g. So as much as they talk about returning to the traditions of the founding era, it is they, of the Red American nation who hate the seminal principle underlying the American idea --- government authority emanates from the people, and that therefore, there can be no one-person rule! There can be no dictator! There must be No Kings! (Chant! NO KINGS! NO KINGS! NO KINGS!)

h. We are believers in the grand American traditions of democratic conversation and checks on personalistic forms of rule.

V. We must not just talk about defending the values of our Blue Nation, but we must stand up for those values in all the institutional spaces where we can still prevail ... This will not be easy, and many people will be hurt as a result (but folks being hurt already; so we might as well push back and go down swinging!)

a. But I’m not talking about us going down and out! I’m talking about push back from our institutional spaces.

Heroes for the Day

-         All of the universities thus far have refused to sign Trump’s Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education. Google it. It would end academic freedom and free speech on university campuses (signees supposedly would receive preferential funding from federal government.

-         Governor Gavin Newsome of California, who recently said that any public universities in California who signed the compact, lose their state funding.

-         Costco Corporation who basically told Trump they value diversity and an inclusive environment in the workplace, saying it was good for business.

-         Washington D.C. football team and Cleveland baseball team who were pressured by Trump to change their mascots back to the offensive Native ones ... Neither have budged! The Cleveland Guardians ... announced that they have engaged with their community and invested a lot of effort into the name change discussion, and they’re not going back!

-         To a regional school superintendent here in Washington who I heard say on a panel that “call it what you want! But I don’t know how an educator cannot recognize that a student body is diverse, that the school culture must therefore be inclusive, and giving each student a fair opportunity to learn requires equity ...

-         To all the federal judges below the Supreme Court level who have rendered rulings finding the administration’s action illegal, and even unconstitutional.

c. These are examples. But look around you! They are not as strong as they look. If all of us who oppose them push back in big ways in corporate and nonprofit settings, and in any number of small ways in our daily lives I believe that Trump 2.0 and Red Nationalism won’t hold up.

d. Since the soldiers in Blue marched to victory in the battle to end slavery, our Blue nation has invested over 150 years into making good on one other foundational American idea ... that all of us are equal before the law. And that in the end must include even those would be King!

(Chant!) NO KINGS! NO KINGS! NO KINGS!

Robert Sarazin Blake and Charlie Maliszewski ... Come on up!

Join in leading the singing of one of the great songs of the labor movement and the civil rights, “We Shall Not Be Moved!

We shall not, We shall not be moved! We shall not, We shall not be moved!

Just like a tree that’s planted in the water, We shall not be moved!

-         With voices raised together ... We shall not be moved! (3 times, repeat 3rd)

-         We’re Standing up for Justice      “     “     “

-         Honor the Indigenous                    “      “    “

-         Standing with Farmworkers         “     “     “

-         We Honor the Constitution         “      “     “

-         We’re Fighting against Fascism   “     “     “

-         We’re Fighting for our Future     “     “     “

Thank you! Now check out the tabling organizations to see how you can get actively involved.